pale
“All I ever wanted was a world without maps.”
Michael Ondaatje
pale
years-of-indiscretion:
SXF
Dieter Roth - [title not known], 1970
karmakarmanyc:

Mike Kelly, Peter Fischli, David Weiss
“The next day I went back and demanded my trophy and made it clear that I would keep returning until it was given to me.”
Sammlung Goetz, Munich, 2000
9.5 x 7 inches (24.13 x 17.78 cm)
$400 Purchase 
peter gallo
Joseph Cornell, 1953
zoeritts:

i was thinking recently about my small (relatively - 85 at last count) but beloved collection of books. as physical objects they’re almost all very dear to me. i did a big purge during my last apartment move and kept only, or almost only, books with emotional significance, such as ones i received as gifts. alright, and, of course, many others that aren’t easy to find or meant a lot to me at the time of my reading them. a quick list of some of my favourite art / or art related books:vitamin d: new perspectives in drawing (2005) - - - big anthologies like this are a great way to become familiar with new artists
emily carr, the house of all sorts (1944) - - - just a lovely personal account of the years she spent running a rooming house in vancouver. john berger, ways of seeing (1972) - - - one of the first art theory books i really sunk my teeth into. it was really exciting to encounter art history form a marxist perspective.leanne shapton, Important Artifacts and Personal Property from the Collection of Lenore Doolan and Harold Morris (2009) - - - i actually only read this recently, but it was incredibly impacting. a lovely project, and though deeply sad, i’m glad i read it when i did.radical nature (2009) - - - this was another really exciting book to encounter, on different artists and architects who approach nature, landscape, and biology in their work. i covet, but do not own (which is fine) this wonderful book.lloyd kahn, shelter (1973) - - - the ultimate back-to-the-land manual for builders. 
…there are so many others, but these are the first i think of. 
ZoomInfo
zoeritts:

i hardly know what to make of this trend in art (montreal-based art, at least) of fetishizing ‘the north.’ is this just another incarnation of the european-north american frontier myth? i guess it really isn’t anything new - but i’ve been encountering it more and more since moving to montreal a few years ago. and it seems i’ve sought in out, too, in books like farley mowatt’s the people of the deer, or mordecai richler’s solomon gursky was here (one of my absolute favourite novels). it must just be that the openness of the north continues to capture people’s imaginations. is this inherently politically problematic? (perhaps it’s time to check out peter white’s book on the canadian landscape in art, beyond wilderness)i like these photo / paintings by sarah anne johnson from her series ”arctic wonderland”. my current favourite piece to do with ‘the north’ is charles stankievich’s loveland, which i posted a while ago.
zoeritts:

i hardly know what to make of this trend in art (montreal-based art, at least) of fetishizing ‘the north.’ is this just another incarnation of the european-north american frontier myth? i guess it really isn’t anything new - but i’ve been encountering it more and more since moving to montreal a few years ago. and it seems i’ve sought in out, too, in books like farley mowatt’s the people of the deer, or mordecai richler’s solomon gursky was here (one of my absolute favourite novels). it must just be that the openness of the north continues to capture people’s imaginations. is this inherently politically problematic? (perhaps it’s time to check out peter white’s book on the canadian landscape in art, beyond wilderness)i like these photo / paintings by sarah anne johnson from her series ”arctic wonderland”. my current favourite piece to do with ‘the north’ is charles stankievich’s loveland, which i posted a while ago.
zoeritts:

i hardly know what to make of this trend in art (montreal-based art, at least) of fetishizing ‘the north.’ is this just another incarnation of the european-north american frontier myth? i guess it really isn’t anything new - but i’ve been encountering it more and more since moving to montreal a few years ago. and it seems i’ve sought in out, too, in books like farley mowatt’s the people of the deer, or mordecai richler’s solomon gursky was here (one of my absolute favourite novels). it must just be that the openness of the north continues to capture people’s imaginations. is this inherently politically problematic? (perhaps it’s time to check out peter white’s book on the canadian landscape in art, beyond wilderness)i like these photo / paintings by sarah anne johnson from her series ”arctic wonderland”. my current favourite piece to do with ‘the north’ is charles stankievich’s loveland, which i posted a while ago.
zoeritts:

this looks like the moon. it’s not, but is, fittingly, a metal launch pad scorched by rocket engine(s?) at cape canaveral. i can’t find much more on it, but it was photographed by charles stankievech, an artist i’ve mentioned before. whose work i obviously like. here’s a bizarre article about him, which details his various interests in the arctic, geographies, and space (in numerous senses of the word!).
Kunsthaus Bregenz
ZoomInfo
Claes Oldenburg. New York: Judson Gallery, 1959
Claes Oldenburg. New York: Judson Gallery, 1959
confessionalaesthete:

Ingar Krauss, 2011